But the 88mm KwK 36 (L/56) could pierce approximately 100mm of homogenious steel, modern MBTs have armour equivalents of 900 to 1000mm against kinetic projectiles. The Pzkpfw Tiger II was a outstanding tank in WWII. However I think the weapon is hopelessly outdated by today's MBT's. The 502nd Heavy Panzer Battalion, was one of Germany's most successful heavy tank battalions during the Second World War, claiming the destruction of 1,400 t The historian at the deutche panzermuseum Ralf Raths said the reason for the flat shapes was because many german engineers believed that the armor plates should support/rest against each other to create a sturdier design that could hold up against taking hits, i.e a flat front plate that is aborbing a hit pushing it backwards is held securely in place by the flat cornes of the side armor Panther was not an MBT since it didn't have mass of a medium tank and didn't have protection of a heavy tank. As well as the Germans couldn't have possibly replace all the tanks with a Panther. Also AFAIK the Panther lacked breakthrough tank capabilities. This was purely because the development of technology. Abrams wins both rounds at least 9/10 times. R1: the tigers have no chance of getting through the frontal armor. they’d have to hit it from the sides. in this instance, the abrams can pop smoke and hightail it outta there while letting off rounds. it can then take them out at a suitable distance. 8/10 abrams. Even in 1946 a committee was formed to fix the problems of what had become the flagship Soviet tank, and to prevent Western intelligence agencies from finding out how bad the tank really was. As a result, the IS-3 began a nearly continual cycle of upgrades and repairs, with every single tank receiving three major rebuilds and upgrades between 9nhVTHL. Men of War: Assault Squad 2. VETERAN TIGER. This is a guide on the proper use of anything armored, amongst a plethora of other useful information. Use the tiger and hull destroy Persing and IS-2. They are tanks that surpass Tiger. The best way is to break their turret. Tiger I. The King Tiger is actually the superior tank of course, having better armor and firepower. But it is also the least reliable and the one that can be produced in fewer numbers, which were both actually bigger factors to why Germany had trouble with allied tanks than raw armor and firepower where; and besides, they both have armor and firepower over there opponents. Of all of the operational combat tanks fielded in the World War 2, the German "Tiger II" (or "King Tiger") was the best combination of armor protection, firepower and mobility to be had. While showcasing excellent strengths, she was ultimately limited by the deteriorating German war effort in the closing months of the conflict. Comparing: IS-2 vs. Tiger I. Built in 1944, the IS-2 (IS-122) heavy tank was a modification of the IS-1. It featured a simple cast glacis plate. Elite Soviet Guards heavy tank regiments used the IS-2 extensively in the assaults on the fortress cities of Budapest, Breslau, and Berlin. These vehicles featured thick white stripes for quick Weight and engine power comparison Tiger A vs Tiger B. Tiger 1 tank has a total mass of 57 T while the combat weight of Tiger 2 is 70T. However, both the engines output a maximum power of 690Hp. Tiger 2 tank is equipped with V-12 Maybach HL 230 P30 engine. This engine is powered with gasoline.

is 2 tank vs king tiger